Par quelles stratégies les mouvements antidroits en Argentine parviennent-ils à traduire leurs revendications en propositions législatives ? Le cas du projet de loi sur la "falsa denuncia".
Files
Briot_06962401_2026.pdf
UCLouvain restricted access - Adobe PDF
- 807.42 KB
Details
- Supervisors
- Faculty
- Degree label
- Abstract
- This thesis examines the discursive strategies used by anti-rights movements in Argentina to translate their claims into legislative proposals, focusing on Bill S-0228/2025 concerning “false reports”. Situated within the broader reconfiguration of gender policies under Javier Milei’s government, this research investigates how anti-rights claims are articulated through legal and institutional language and circulate across different spaces of political discourse. The theoretical framework draws on feminist and gender studies, as well as scholarship on contemporary anti-gender mobilizations, particularly on processes of juridification, resignification, and the transnational circulation of discursive repertoires. The research adopts a qualitative discourse analysis approach and draws on several types of material: the bill and its Fundamentos, parliamentary debates held by the Senate’s Comisión de Justicia y Asuntos Penales, press articles published between 2024 and 2026, and field observations conducted in Argentina. The analysis focuses on the discursive categories used to construct the issue of “false reports”, representations of victimhood and protection, and the forms of legitimation employed across the different spaces studied. By bringing these materials together, this thesis seeks to understand how claims articulated within anti-rights mobilizations are reformulated, legitimized, and adapted to the Argentine political and institutional context.