En 2026, en Belgique, dans une démarche d'investissement personnel visant la constitution d'un capital en vue de la retraite, lequel de l'épargne-pension, de l'épargne à long terme ou du compte-titres offre le capital final net le plus élevé, et dans quelle mesure la taxe sur les plus-values de 2026 modifie-t-elle cette hiérarchie ?

(2026)

Files

Zannini_6007_24_00_2026_Annexe7.pdf
  • Open access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 129.57 KB

Zannini_6007_24_00_2026.pdf
  • Open access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 1.29 MB

Zannini_6007_24_00_2026_Annexe1.pdf
  • Open access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 41.81 KB

Zannini_6007_24_00_2026_Annexe2.pdf
  • Open access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 131.64 KB

Zannini_6007_24_00_2026_Annexe3.pdf
  • Open access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 123.62 KB

Details

Supervisors
Faculty
Degree label
Abstract
In Belgium, individual investors saving for retirement typically choose between three vehicles: pension savings, long-term savings and a direct securities account. Since 1 January 2026, a 10 % tax on capital gains realised on financial assets has reshaped the trade-off between them. This study systematically compares the three vehicles using a single criterion, the net final capital at age 65, computed through a deterministic simulation over a broad parameter space combining starting age, gross annual return and annual contribution, declined into three fee scenarios and four tax scenarios. The results show that no vehicle is uniformly superior: the ranking depends on the parameters, and recurring fees are the most decisive factor over the long run, more so than exit taxation or the 2026 capital gains tax.